Learn about our COVID-19 response    ->

Material Testing Lab | Innovatech Labs

Material Testing Labs Innovator

  • Request Quote

888-740-5227 Email

Menu
  • Material Testing Methods / Techniques
    • Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)
    • Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) to Measure Heat Flow
    • Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
    • Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)
    • Ion Chromatography (IC)
    • Light Microscopy & Imaging
    • Liquid Particle Counting (LPC)
    • Electron Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis (ESCA)
    • Melt Flow Testing
    • Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
    • Thermal Gravitational Analysis (TGA) Lab Services
    • Close
  • Analytical Services
    • Cleanliness Testing for Microcontamination
    • Failure Analysis Testing Services
    • Material Testing Services for Products and Components
    • Materials Characterization & Specialized Testing
    • Outgassing Testing Services Prevents Critical Errors
    • Quality Control Testing for Manufactured Products
    • Close
  • Industries
    • Hard Drive Microcontamination Testing Services
    • Manufacturing Support
    • Critical Medical Device Testing Services
    • Close
  • About
    • Sample Submission Form: Download
    • Professional Services / Consulting
      • Metallurgical Consulting
      • Short Courses
      • Technical Presentations
      • Close
    • Testimonials
    • Close
  • Case Studies
  • Newsroom
You are here: Home / Newsroom / Auger Electron Spectroscopy Blog Posts / What’s the Difference Between ESCA Analysis and Auger Electron Spectroscopy?

What’s the Difference Between ESCA Analysis and Auger Electron Spectroscopy?

June 30, 2016 by Jennifer Mathias Leave a Comment

ESCA Analysis vs. Auger Electron SpectroscopyAll manufacturers strive to produce the highest quality products for their customers. As a result, materials testing services from a materials testing lab like Innovatech Labs are frequently used to ensure that product quality.

Materials testing can uncover the causes of product failures, identify contaminants or toxins, and also determine the chemical composition of samples. When it comes to analyzing the surfaces of products, Electron Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis (ESCA) and Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) are two commonly used materials testing techniques. While both have similar applications, each is unique and valuable for different situations.

Below we discuss similarities and differences, and when each technique is utilized.

Similarities

ESCA and AES are both known for their ability to analyze thin films, stains and contaminants on the surfaces of products. Also, both techniques can be used to analyze passivation layers on metallic surfaces. AES can be performed on conductive and semi-conductive materials, ESCA can be performed on these types of materials in addition to polymers, glass and other insulating materials. As a result, both techniques can be useful for electronics and medical device manufacturers.

Differences

Instrumentation and Sample Extraction

ESCA analysis, which is also called X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (or XPS), uses an x-ray beam to excite atoms on the surface of a solid sample, which results in the emission of photoelectrons. Then, an energy analysis of the photoelectrons is performed to identify both elemental and chemical bonding information.

On the other hand, AES uses an electron beam to excite atoms, which results in the emission of electrons known as Auger electrons. Like ESCA, an energy analysis is then conducted to uncover the analytical information.

Unique Applications

ESCA analysis can analyze oxidation of chromium and iron. This is especially useful for electronics and medical device manufacturers that worry about oxidation leading to product malfunction or failure. For example, an electronics manufacturer discovered a haze on a polyimide film. The manufacturer believed that the haze was from the chromium film that was not completely etched away during manufacturing. ESCA scanned the area and determined that there was in fact a presence of chromium, supporting the manufacturer’s theory.

As for AES, this technique can analyze the chemistry and thickness of passivation layers of stents and small diameter wires. For example, AES was performed on a Nitinol stent to determine any impurities in the oxide layer and the thickness of the layer. Testing revealed that the passivation layer was composed mostly of titanium dioxide and its thickness was approximately 300 angstroms.

When is Each Testing Method Used?

ESCA analysis can be used to:

  • Evaluate the passivation of stainless steels and the oxidation of chromium and iron
  • Analyze the surface chemistry of polymers, glasses and other insulators
  • Resolve issues related to metal interdiffusion, resin-to-metal adhesion or oxidation

AES can be used to:

  • Determine the chemical composition of a surfaces and interfaces
  • Analyze contamination and stains
  • Analyze passivation layers

For more information on ESCA analysis, Auger Electron Spectroscopy or any other materials testing services from Innovatech Labs, contact us today.

Filed Under: Auger Electron Spectroscopy Blog Posts, ESCA Blog Posts & Resources Tagged With: Auger Electron Spectroscopy, ESCA analysis, materials analysis, materials testing

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Innovatech Labs, LLC

13805 1st Ave N, Ste 100
Plymouth, MN 55441
888-740-5227
info@innovatechlabs.com

  • Material Testing Lab [Home]
  • Case Studies
  • Request A Quote
  • Terms of Service
  • FTIR Analysis
  • GC/MS Analysis
  • TGA Analysis
  • Newsroom
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
CompliAssure Secured Logo

© 2022 · Innovatech Labs, LLC