Pop quiz, quality control specialists and product developers. Which is a better surface analysis method: X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) or Electron Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis (ESCA)?
The answer? Trick question. XPS and ESCA are actually the same technique.
But fun and games aside, this materials testing method has wide ranging applications as an effective quality assurance and product testing tool for polymers, plastics, medical devices, electronics, and more. That said, it’s not ideal in every testing scenario.
Like anything in this world, XPS has both pros and cons. And sample size, sample compatibility, type of material, and other factors play a significant role in determining whether XPS is right for your needs.
So, what are the advantages and disadvantages of XPS or ESCA? Read on for some top considerations.
Advantages of XPS or ESCA Analysis
If surface chemistry or thickness is critical to product function and safety, XPS analysis is a proven choice. It provides a detailed breakdown of the elemental composition (at the parts per thousand range), empirical formula, chemical state, and electronic state of the elements contained in the material’s surface. The following are the top reasons to consider XPS as a materials test for your product sample.
1. XPS analysis is effective across a range of organic and inorganic materials.
XPS can detect all elements except hydrogen and helium, with detection limits of ca. 0.1 atomic percent. This makes it an ideal analysis for both conductive and insulating samples including ceramics, glasses, polymers, semiconductors, metals, composite materials, and strongly adsorbed liquids or gases on surfaces.
2. XPS is a leading technique for analyzing stainless steel passivation.
For any industry that leverages stainless steel for manufacturing or within manufacturing processes, rust prevention is a top priority to ensure products or equipment are quality-made, safe, and function as intended. XPS checks a material’s corrosion, adhesion, and friction properties, as well as any chemical reactions to ensure it’s up to the challenge.
3. XPS is also effective at identifying surface contaminants.
The XPS process can distinguish contaminants or stains present on the thin surface layers of plastics or polymers, providing data that may lead to the source of the problem within the manufacturing process. Furthermore, if suspect metal interdiffusion is an issue, XPS can provide the empirical formula of a material that is free of excessive surface contamination.
4. XPS is an efficient testing method.
When you work with an experienced materials processing lab, analysis can be done in as little as 30 minutes with full results within one business day.
Disadvantages of ESCA or XPS Analysis
While very versatile, XPS is not a good choice for all materials testing. These are a few of the reasons why you may wish you consider other types of materials testing.
1. Size matters.
The sample cannot exceed 1 inch (25 mm) in any lateral direction, and height should not exceed ½ inch (12 mm). Also the minimum area of analysis can vary depending on your lab partner; our minimum area requirement is ca. 1 mm.
It’s also important to note that size can be a limiting factor depending on the sample. Cutting a sample is not always an option and can lead to added contamination of the area of interest.
2. Challenges with reproducibility.
Similar to other surface analysis techniques, XPS is associated with a 10% relative error in repeated analyses. In addition, the measured or inferred value and its actual value may differ by up to 20%.
3. Samples must be compatible with high vacuum environment.
Samples must be amenable to a high vacuum environment (ca. 1×10-9 Torr). So, if your sample will outgas when placed under vacuum, XPS is not the right test for your needs.
Is XPS a Fit for Your Materials Analysis Needs?
XPS analysis is highly valued as a measurement tool for a wide range of organic and inorganic materials because it not only shows which elements are within the material’s surface but also how the elements are bonded together.
For manufacturers that make products where surface chemistry or thickness is critical to product function and safety, XPS testing and analysis could help you troubleshoot issues or ensure compliance with quality standards.
Since 1990 Innovatech Labs has provided materials testing with extremely fast turnaround. While standard lead time is five business days or less, with expedited analysis, you can expect results in just 24-48 hours. Contact us today for more information about XPS analysis or other testing services. Or, request a quote to get the project rolling.
Leave a Reply