Learn about our COVID-19 response    ->

Material Testing Lab | Innovatech Labs

Material Testing Labs Innovator

  • Request Quote

888-740-5227 Email

Menu
  • Material Testing Methods / Techniques
    • Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)
    • Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) to Measure Heat Flow
    • Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
    • Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)
    • Ion Chromatography (IC)
    • Light Microscopy & Imaging
    • Liquid Particle Counting (LPC)
    • Electron Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis (ESCA)
    • Melt Flow Testing
    • Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
    • Thermal Gravitational Analysis (TGA) Lab Services
    • Close
  • Analytical Services
    • Cleanliness Testing for Microcontamination
    • Failure Analysis Testing Services
    • Material Testing Services for Products and Components
    • Materials Characterization & Specialized Testing
    • Outgassing Testing Services Prevents Critical Errors
    • Quality Control Testing for Manufactured Products
    • Close
  • Industries
    • Hard Drive Microcontamination Testing Services
    • Manufacturing Support
    • Critical Medical Device Testing Services
    • Close
  • About
    • Sample Submission Form
    • Professional Services / Consulting
      • Metallurgical Consulting
      • Short Courses
      • Technical Presentations
      • Close
    • Testimonials
    • Close
  • Case Studies
  • Newsroom
You are here: Home / Newsroom / ESCA Blog Posts & Resources / The Advantages and Disadvantages of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS/ESCA)

The Advantages and Disadvantages of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS/ESCA)

November 13, 2019 by Jennifer Mathias Leave a Comment

Advantages and Disadvantages of XPS Testing & AnalysisPop quiz, quality control specialists and product developers. Which is a better surface analysis method: X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) or Electron Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis (ESCA)? 

The answer? Trick question. XPS and ESCA are actually the same technique. 

But fun and games aside, this materials testing method has wide ranging applications as an effective quality assurance and product testing tool for polymers, plastics, medical devices, electronics, and more. That said, it’s not ideal in every testing scenario.

Like anything in this world, XPS has both pros and cons. And sample size, sample compatibility, type of material, and other factors play a significant role in determining whether XPS is right for your needs.

So, what are the advantages and disadvantages of XPS or ESCA? Read on for some top considerations. 

Advantages of XPS or ESCA Analysis

If surface chemistry or thickness is critical to product function and safety, XPS analysis is a proven choice. It provides a detailed breakdown of the elemental composition (at the parts per thousand range), empirical formula, chemical state, and electronic state of the elements contained in the material’s surface. The following are the top reasons to consider XPS as a materials test for your product sample.

1. XPS analysis is effective across a range of organic and inorganic materials. 

XPS can detect all elements except hydrogen and helium, with detection limits of ca. 0.1 atomic percent. This makes it an ideal analysis for both conductive and insulating samples including ceramics, glasses, polymers, semiconductors, metals, composite materials, and strongly adsorbed liquids or gases on surfaces.

2. XPS is a leading technique for analyzing stainless steel passivation.

For any industry that leverages stainless steel for manufacturing or within manufacturing processes, rust prevention is a top priority to ensure products or equipment are quality-made, safe, and function as intended. XPS checks a material’s corrosion, adhesion, and friction properties, as well as any chemical reactions to ensure it’s up to the challenge.

3. XPS is also effective at identifying surface contaminants.

The XPS process can distinguish contaminants or stains present on the thin surface layers of plastics or polymers, providing data that may lead to the source of the problem within the manufacturing process. Furthermore, if suspect metal interdiffusion is an issue, XPS can provide the empirical formula of a material that is free of excessive surface contamination.

4. XPS is an efficient testing method.

When you work with an experienced materials processing lab, analysis can be done in as little as 30 minutes with full results within one business day.

Disadvantages of ESCA or XPS Analysis

While very versatile, XPS is not a good choice for all materials testing. These are a few of the reasons why you may wish you consider other types of materials testing.

1. Size matters.

The sample cannot exceed 1 inch (25 mm) in any lateral direction, and height should not exceed ½ inch (12 mm). Also the minimum area of analysis can vary depending on your lab partner; our minimum area requirement is ca. 1 mm. 

It’s also important to note that size can be a limiting factor depending on the sample. Cutting a sample is not always an option and can lead to added contamination of the area of interest.

2. Challenges with reproducibility.

Similar to other surface analysis techniques, XPS is associated with a 10% relative error in repeated analyses. In addition, the measured or inferred value and its actual value may differ by up to 20%. 

3. Samples must be compatible with high vacuum environment.

Samples must be amenable to a high vacuum environment (ca. 1×10-9 Torr). So, if your sample will outgas when placed under vacuum, XPS is not the right test for your needs.

Is XPS a Fit for Your Materials Analysis Needs?

XPS analysis is highly valued as a measurement tool for a wide range of organic and inorganic materials because it not only shows which elements are within the material’s surface but also how the elements are bonded together. 

For manufacturers that make products where surface chemistry or thickness is critical to product function and safety, XPS testing and analysis could help you troubleshoot issues or ensure compliance with quality standards. 

Since 1990 Innovatech Labs has provided materials testing with extremely fast turnaround. While standard lead time is five business days or less, with expedited analysis, you can expect results in just 24-48 hours. Contact us today for more information about XPS analysis or other testing services. Or, request a quote to get the project rolling.

Filed Under: ESCA Blog Posts & Resources, Newsroom Tagged With: ESCA analysis, XPS

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Innovatech Labs, LLC
13805 First Ave. N. Suite 100
Plymouth, MN 55441
888-740-5227
info@innovatechlabs.com

  • Material Testing Lab [Home]
  • Case Studies
  • Request A Quote
  • Terms of Service
  • FTIR Analysis
  • GC/MS Analysis
  • TGA Analysis
  • Newsroom
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
CompliAssure Secured Logo

© 2021 · Innovatech Labs, LLC